top of page

You Say Respect. I Hear Something Else.

2 days ago
7 min read

A room full of people can agree that respect matters.


They can nod together. Choose it as a team value. Print it on posters. Add it to performance frameworks. Repeat it during difficult conversations.

And still hurt each other in the name of respect.


Because we may share the same word without sharing the same meaning.


For one person, respect means telling the truth directly.

For another, respect means choosing your words carefully.


For one leader, respect means giving people autonomy.

For another, it means stepping in before someone struggles alone.


For one person, loyalty means staying.

For another, loyalty means having the courage to challenge what is no longer working.


Both people may believe they are protecting the same value while experiencing the other person as violating it.


That is where many workplace conflicts truly begin.

Not because someone has no values.

But because our values have been shaped into convictions by entirely different lives.


Convictions are not simply opinions

An opinion is something we think.

A conviction is something we have come to believe is true, often so deeply that we no longer recognize it as a belief.


It becomes the lens through which we interpret the room.


A colleague questions our decision, and we do not merely hear curiosity. We hear disrespect.


Someone gives us space, and we do not experience autonomy. We experience abandonment.


A leader asks for more detail, and we do not hear responsible challenge. We hear mistrust.


A team member avoids conflict, believing they are protecting harmony. Their colleague experiences silence as dishonesty.


None of us enters a conversation empty-handed. We bring every room we have survived into the room we are standing in now.


Our convictions have histories.


Sometimes we feel strongly about respect because we know what it is like to be humiliated.


We protect fairness because we have experienced exclusion.


We fight for autonomy because control once made us feel powerless.


We create safety for others because we remember what it felt like when nobody created it for us.


Our fiercest convictions are often standing guard over an older wound.


Beneath the conviction, something deeper is being protected

Convictions are not our dragons.

In my layered personality model, the dragons live much deeper, in the core.


Our convictions sit further outward. They are the beliefs we have developed about ourselves, other people, and the world. They help us interpret what is happening and decide how to respond.


But when a conviction becomes fierce, rigid, or emotionally charged, it may be carrying an alarm from somewhere deeper.


Someone questions our decision.

At the visible layers, they may see us becoming defensive, controlling, silent, or unusually determined.

At the conviction layer, we may believe:

They do not respect me.


If I lose control, everything will fall apart.


I must prove that I am competent.


If I disappoint them, I will no longer belong.


But deeper still, in the core, a dragon has awakened.

Not because the dragon is the conviction, but because something central to our safety, worth, identity, or belonging appears to be threatened.


By the time another person encounters our reaction, they rarely see the core or the dragon protecting it.

They see only what has traveled through the layers.

They see the conviction we defend.


They hear the rationale we use to explain it.


They experience the behavior it produces.


They form an opinion about the personality we present to the world.


They see the raised voice, the sudden silence, the excessive explanation, the refusal to let go, or the need to take control.


Then they respond from their own layers, their own behaviors, convictions, values, rationales, and core.

That is how two dragons can awaken while two human beings argue about who is right.

“I am open-minded” does not mean “I have no convictions”

Some convictions are easy to name.


Others hide behind identities we feel proud of:

❤️‍🔥 I am rational.

❤️‍🔥 I am helpful.

❤️‍🔥 I am strong.

❤️‍🔥 I am easygoing.

❤️‍🔥 I am open-minded.


Even these can become shields.


“I am open-minded”

may make it difficult to recognize the beliefs we refuse to question.


“I am helpful”

may hide the conviction that we are only worthy when somebody needs us.


“I am rational”

may prevent us from admitting that our conclusions are also shaped by fear, loyalty, pain, and belonging.


“I am easygoing”

may conceal how often we abandon our own boundaries to avoid disappointing someone else.


Sometimes we become so committed to understanding everyone else’s perspective that we begin gaslighting ourselves.


We explain their intentions.

We minimize our reaction.

We make room for their history.

We question whether we are being too sensitive.


Empathy is a leadership strength.

Self-erasure is not.


Another person’s perspective can be valid without making your experience imaginary.


Two people can see the same room differently. Both may be describing something real. Neither has access to the entire room.


Your worst behavior may point toward something you deeply value

This is one of the more uncomfortable invitations in leadership development:

🔥 Look at the behavior you are least proud of.

Not to shame yourself.

To become curious about what lies beneath it.


💚 Perhaps you become controlling when the quality of the work matters deeply to you.

💚 Perhaps you withdraw because dignity matters and you no longer feel safe.

💚 Perhaps you become defensive because being seen as competent has become connected to your sense of worth.

💚 Perhaps you rescue everyone because care is one of your deepest values but you have not yet learned that caring for someone and carrying them are not the same thing.


The behavior still has consequences.

Understanding it does not remove accountability.


But accountability without understanding rarely creates transformation. It usually creates suppression.


We learn to display the “right” behavior while the deeper layers remain untouched.


The dragon stays alert in the core.

The same convictions continue interpreting what happens around us.


The same behaviors return when pressure removes our ability to carefully manage what the world sees.


Behavior change cannot reach the core by itself

This is why behavior-only leadership development so often fails.


It teaches people to communicate calmly, listen actively, delegate effectively, and remain curious.


These are valuable skills but they exist in the outer layers.


If the core still experiences danger, the new behavior will be difficult to sustain.


Under pressure, the alarm moves outward again.


The conviction returns:

🖤 I cannot trust them.

🖤 I have to handle this myself.

🖤 Conflict will destroy the relationship.

🖤 If I am not useful, I have no value here.


The old behavior follows.

This is not proof that someone is incapable of growth.


It is evidence that the work has not yet reached the layer where the reaction begins.


Real transformation does not involve defeating, taming, or silencing the dragon.


The dragon developed for a reason.


Transformation means becoming willing to travel through our own layers, to notice the behavior, question the conviction, understand the values and rationales beneath it, and eventually listen to what the dragon in our core is trying to protect.


Then we can help it recognize something important:

The present is not always the past.


Someone challenging us is not necessarily humiliating us.

Someone needing space is not necessarily abandoning us.

Someone disagreeing with our perspective is not necessarily rejecting us.


The dragon can remain in the core without controlling every conviction we hold or every behavior we bring into the room.


Growth does not always mean abandoning the conviction

Sometimes growth means changing the way we carry it.


“I need somebody else to create safety for me”

can become:

“I know how to create safety for myself and I want to help create it for others.”

“I must prove that I am right”

can become:

“I can trust my perception while remaining curious about what I cannot see.”

“If I care, I must fix it”

can become:

“I can care deeply without taking away another person’s agency.”

“I must avoid conflict to protect the relationship”

can become:

“This relationship deserves enough honesty to survive a difficult conversation.”

The value may remain.

The conviction evolves.


The behavior changes because something deeper has changed, not because we have become better at hiding what is happening inside us.


That kind of transformation requires more than information.

It requires courage.


A conviction connected to identity, family, culture, belonging, or survival will not dissolve because someone presents a clever argument or shows us a better PowerPoint slide.


We have to become willing to ask:

What has this conviction protected in me?
What value am I trying to honor?
What does my rationale allow me to avoid?
What is my dragon afraid will happen if I respond differently?
What is this protection costing me now?
Who might I become if my dragon no longer needed to sound the same alarm?

Leaders must go beyond naming shared values

If your team says it values respect, do not stop there.


Ask:

What does respect look like when we disagree?
Does directness feel respectful here or threatening?
When does offering help become interference?
When does autonomy become abandonment?
What does accountability sound like when someone has made a mistake?
What happens when two of our values collide?

A value printed on a wall cannot resolve a conflict.

People need the language, safety, and self-awareness to explore what that value means through different human lenses.


Otherwise, “respect” becomes a weapon everyone believes they are entitled to use.


The most mature leaders do not demand that everyone see the room exactly as they do.


They also do not pretend that every interpretation is equally accurate or that harmful behavior should be excused because somebody had good intentions.


They become capable of holding several truths at once:

My experience is real.
Your experience may also be real.

Our intentions matter.

Our impact matters too.

Understanding the dragon does not excuse the fire.


But if we never understand what awakened the dragon, the fire will keep returning.


The next time you find yourself fighting to prove that what you saw, heard, or experienced must be the only possible truth, pause.


🔥 Your conviction is telling you how you have learned to understand the situation.

🔥 Your behavior is showing how you have learned to respond to it.

🔥 And somewhere deeper, in your core, a dragon may be sounding an alarm.


Listen to it.

Honor what it is protecting.

Then look around the room again.


Your dragon may be protecting something real.

But another person may also be seeing the room correctly from a window you cannot yet see through.

That is not weakness.

That is not surrender.

That is the courageous work of leadership. 💚🔥🐉


Join the next run of the Leadership Landing program, begins in January.




Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

© 2026 Avagasso Leadership Coaching

bottom of page